Publié le 24 mars 2018
Where the trial judge’s reasoning is not apparent from the reasons or the record, the appeal court ought not to substitute its own analysis for that of the trial judge : R. c. Black, 2018 CSC 10
R. c. Black, 2018 CSC 10 R. v. Black, 2017 ONCA 599 [40] Although I agree with the principle of law that the sufficiency of the trial judge’s reasons must be assessed within this context, “[t]his exercise is not an invitation to appellate courts to engage in a reassessment of aspects of the case […]
Me Félix-Antoine T. Doyon
Lire la suite
